category activity A104

UTBMS Code A104 — Review/Analyze Documents

edit_note By CounselAudit Research
|
update

Reviewing and analyzing documents, correspondence, filings, and other materials for substantive legal content, risks, or action items. This is one of the most frequently used activity codes across all matter types.

schedule When This Code Is Used

When attorneys are reviewing incoming documents, analyzing filings from opposing counsel, assessing contracts for risk, or reviewing any materials that require legal judgment to evaluate.

warning Common Billing Violations

report

Using A104 as a default catch-all code for any time that does not have a clear activity classification, inflating review hours

report

Billing for 'review and analyze' without specifying what was reviewed or what the analysis yielded

report

Multiple attorneys reviewing the same document at senior rates without differentiated analytical tasks

report

Padding entries with generic 'review correspondence' for emails that took seconds to read

timer Typical Hours

Highly variable by document type: 0.1-0.5 hours per email/letter, 1-5 hours per brief/motion, 2-10 hours per contract.

flag Red Flags to Watch For

flag

A104 representing more than 30% of total activity hours across the matter, suggesting catch-all usage

flag

Vague entries like 'review and analyze file' without specifying the documents reviewed

flag

Multiple senior attorneys billing A104 hours for the same incoming filing

flag

Consistent daily A104 entries at the same hour count suggesting template billing rather than actual review

check_circle Best Practices for Review

check_circle

Require that A104 entries specify the document reviewed and the purpose of the analysis

check_circle

Set a maximum percentage of total billing attributable to A104 (typically 20-25%)

check_circle

Establish that routine correspondence review is captured in minimum increments, not padded

check_circle

Track A104 usage patterns by timekeeper to identify those using it as a default code

link Related Codes

analytics Key Statistics

trending_up

Document review and analysis accounts for 20-30% of total billed hours across all litigation phases, not just discovery

Source: EDRM Survey on Discovery Costs, 2024

trending_up

Senior attorneys review documents at rates 2-3x higher than contract attorneys for equivalent quality on routine review tasks

Source: ACC Legal Operations Survey, 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

What does UTBMS activity code A104 cover? expand_more

UTBMS activity code A104 covers Review and Analyze Documents, including reviewing opposing party filings, analyzing contracts, reviewing correspondence, and examining evidence. It is distinct from document review for production purposes under L320.

How do you prevent overbilling on document review under A104? expand_more

Ensure A104 is not double-counted with L320 document production review. Set expectations for review rates based on document complexity. Require that routine document review be performed at associate or paralegal rates and challenge partner-level billing for standard review tasks.

What is the difference between A104 document review and L320? expand_more

A104 is an activity code for reviewing and analyzing documents as part of any litigation phase. L320 is a phase code specifically for document review and production during discovery. A matter might use both, but the same work should not be billed under both codes simultaneously.

Automate UTBMS compliance checking

CounselAudit.ai validates every line item against your billing guidelines.